Category

Investing

Category

Romios Gold Resources Inc. (TSXV: RG,OTC:RMIOF) (OTCID: RMIOF) (FSE: D4R) (‘Romios Gold’ or the ‘Company’). In advance of the Company’s Annual General and Special Meeting (‘AGSM’) scheduled for January 16, 2026, Romios’s new CEO Kevin Keough is pleased to recap for the benefit of shareholders recent accomplishments and provide context to key items to be voted upon at the AGSM – particularly the rebrand and proposed share consolidation – which are fundamentally important to the prospects for increasing the value of their individual shareholdings in 2026.

‘I became involved with Romios earlier this year, and took on, along with your capable president, Stephen Burega, the task of restructuring and rebranding the Company, and the considerable work and risk involved, solely because I see in the results of the exploration work conducted on the Company’s Trek South porphyry copper-gold prospect a highly compelling discovery prospect. I’m really excited by it, and very pleased to be heading up the team that intends to be, with your support, the first to drill it.

It’s clear that for the past many years the Company’s share price has remained at a low level due to the lack of a major discovery. I consider it my primary responsibility as CEO, and that of our team, to change that dynamic and provide in the year ahead at least one discovery of merit. Trek South is where we plan to start.

Over the past six months, significant steps have been completed to reinvigorate and position the Company with the above goal in mind. Recent accomplishments include: settling a significant amount of debt; reinvigorating the board with independent directors trained and experienced in corporate governance, geosciences and finance; reconstituting key committees of the board; closing two property deals that have injected significant cash into the Company; and completing an over-subscribed private placement financing with new money from myself and European and Canadian investors that has provided the working capital needed to ensure the Company continues as a going concern, while working through the restructuring process.

All of these accomplishments have been for the purpose of refocusing the Company’s efforts and resources on the Trek South prospect which we believe, based on the evidence highlighted below, shows promise of delivering a major discovery in the near term. I could not have done any of this alone, so thank you Stephen, and thanks also to our highly experienced VP Exploration, John Biczok, for the outstanding field work this summer, in which both Stephen and I had the pleasure of participating.

Remaining on our agenda are the key tasks scheduled to be voted upon at the AGSM on January 16. Firstly, approval of a name change to Oreterra Metals Corp. which goes hand-in-hand with the corporate make-over and is necessary to help re-establish the Company’s market appeal and renew the brand. The other major item on our agenda is the all-important share consolidation, which is a needed precursor to raising the financing required to carry out the initial phases of drilling at the Trek South prospect in the forthcoming 2026 field season.

These initial drilling phases and associated budgets will be detailed in an independent National Instrument 43-101 technical report on the Trek property for release later this month or very early in January. Using these metrics, the Company intends to price a post consolidated financing in the first week of January and to announce that financing, and the final consolidation ratio based upon that financing, ahead of the AGSM. The share consolidation, coupled with the outstanding discovery prospects at Trek South, will ensure a successful raise. All of these matters will be conditional upon shareholder approval, and the approval also of the TSX Venture Exchange.

The anticipated rollback will not change the value of our individual shareholder positions in the Company, nor your/our proportional ownership thereof, but rather provide the basis, along with the subsequent injection of new capital and the application of that capital to the maiden drill program at Trek South, for increasing – and potentially greatly increasing – the value of all of our shareholdings in the Company.

Your newly reinvigorated board is fully supportive of the plan and goals your team has set for the Company. With your support in favour of the resolutions advanced for voting at our AGSM on January 16th, the year ahead may well turn out to be the most significant in the Company’s history.

I would be happy to discuss any of these matters directly with you, at my direct line below. In the meantime, I wish to leave you with the following bullets which summarize the case as to why Trek South ranks so highly as an exploration prospect.’

Kevin Keough
Chief Executive Officer
Romios Gold Resources Inc.

Why the Trek South prospect is exceptional:

  1. Several hundred thousand square metres of mostly bare bedrock provide excellent visibility to the rocks underfoot. Exposure such as this is rare with greenfield BC porphyry prospects, and provides ‘touch and feel’ confidence that what our geoscience techniques suggests is there, really is;

  2. Exposed underfoot throughout this vast area of bare bedrock is very strong alteration (i.e. changes in the rock mineralogy) typical of porphyry copper systems: i.e. an exceptionally intense network of green epidote – red garnet veining and endoskarn indicative of proximity to a source intrusion or system ‘engine’, overprinted by a stockwork of quartz-pyrite veining, and locally cross-cut by mineralized metre-scale porphyry dykes, possibly representing offshoots from the source intrusion itself;

  3. Also easily visible to the eye across this large area of exposed bedrock are copper minerals such as chalcopyrite, chalcocite, local bornite, and copper weathering products including malachite and azurite;

  4. Geochemical sampling and laboratory assaying of the host volcanic and sedimentary bedrock, and the overprinting quartz-pyrite veins, returns significant values of copper, gold and silver, in addition to local tungsten and molybdenum;

  5. Underlying the broad area of alteration and the metal values is a very large (at least 850 metres long, 500 metres wide and extending to a depth of >650 metres), very strong induced polarization (IP) chargeability anomaly of 40 mV/v, indicating the presence of a large volume of sulphides in the bedrock below. In systems such as these, the sulphides typically are associated with the metals.

  6. Coincident with the IP chargeability anomaly is a highly favourable, strong IP resistivity low;

  7. Underlying the broad area of alteration and metal values and coincident with the IP anomalies is a very large (~850 X 850 metres), strong positive magnetic anomaly. In porphyry deposits a magnetic high anomaly is commonly associated with the potassically-altered, higher-grade core of the source intrusion;

  8. Underlying the broad area of alteration and metal values, and coincident with both the IP and magnetic anomalies is a deep-running magneto-telluric (MT) anomaly, pointing to a large intrusive body running to a depth of at least 2 kms;

  9. The topography across much of the area where the initial drilling is planned to occur, is flat to gently undulating, and completely devoid of vegetation, presenting easy drill set-ups, and minimizing environmental impacts. This, again, is to be envied in the context of B.C. mineral exploration where slopes are commonly steep, and/or heavily tree-covered;

  10. The Trek South site is within several kilometres of the partially completed road (including a bridge, mothballed work camp and heavy equipment storage site) to the Galore Creek porphyry deposits which are currently close to completion of pre-feasibility studies by their owners, Teck and Newmont. Trek South is just 11 kms from the proposed Galore Creek millsite along that same road; just 1.5 km south and upslope from the cleared road right-of-way across the Trek property to Galore Creek, and within 3 to 7 kilometres of the proposed new access tunnel to Galore Creek, depending on the route chosen.

Qualified Person

The technical information in this news release has been reviewed and approved by John Biczok, P.Geo., Vice President, Exploration for Romios Gold and a Qualified Person as defined by National Instrument 43-101.

About Romios Gold Resources Inc.

Romios Gold Resources Inc. is a TSXV-listed mineral exploration company focused primarily on copper and gold. The Company has crafted an ambitious business plan to advance Romios, primarily by refocusing its efforts on achieving discoveries through the drill bit. The Company holds several wholly-owned porphyry copper-gold prospects in British Columbia’s Golden Triangle, the most significant of which is the Trek South prospect, upon which a range of geosciences applied to it in the period since 2022 including mapping, sampling, magnetic, IP and MT geophysical surveys, have delivered high-order, complementary results that all vector to the same conclusion: that the target area offers high discovery potential. A drill permit is in place and an updated NI 43-101 with plan and budget is under preparation. Trek South is located adjacent to Teck-Newmont’s Galore Creek deposits, presently undergoing pre-feasibility studies, and is bisected by the road right-of-way thereto. First-ever drilling of Trek South is planned for the 2026 field season.

Additional wholly-owned interests include two former producers in Nevada: the Kinkaid claims in the Walker Lane trend covering numerous shallow Au-Ag-Cu workings over what is believed to be one or more porphyry centres (source: J.Biczok, P.Geo, June 2025, Kinkaid Gold-Copper-Silver Project, www.romios.com), and the Scossa mine property in the Sleeper trend which is a former high-grade gold producer (source: J.Biczok, P.Geo, July 2025, Scossa Historic Gold Mine Property, www.romios.com). The Company also holds a 100% interest in the large-scale Lundmark-Akow Lake Au-Cu property adjacent to the northwest of the Musselwhite Mine, where drilling by the Company has produced highly encouraging, broad VMS-style Au-Cu intersections. Romios also retains an ongoing interest in several properties including a 2% NSR on McEwen Mining’s Hislop gold property in Ontario and a 2% NSR on Enduro Metals’ Newmont Lake Au-Cu-Ag property in BC.

For further information visit www.romios.com or contact:

Kevin M. Keough
Chief Executive Officer
Tel: 613 622-1916
Email: kkeough@romios.com
Stephen Burega
President
Tel: 647 515-3734
Email: sburega@romios.com

 

Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.

Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information

This news release includes certain ‘forward-looking statements’ which are not comprised of historical facts. Forward-looking statements include estimates and statements that describe the Company’s future plans, objectives or goals, including words to the effect that the Company or management expects a stated condition or result to occur. Forward-looking statements may be identified by such terms as ‘believes’, ‘anticipates’, ‘expects’, ‘estimates’, ‘may’, ‘could’, ‘would’, ‘will’, or ‘plan’. Since forward-looking statements are based on assumptions and address future events and conditions, by their very nature they involve inherent risks and uncertainties. Although these statements are based on information currently available to the Company, the Company provides no assurance that actual results will meet management’s expectations. Risks, uncertainties and other factors involved with forward-looking information could cause actual events, results, performance, prospects and opportunities to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking information. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from such forward-looking information include, but are not limited to failure to identify mineral resources, delays in obtaining or failures to obtain required governmental, environmental or other project approvals, political risks, inability to fulfill the duty to accommodate First Nations, uncertainties relating to the availability and costs of financing needed in the future, changes in equity markets, inflation, changes in exchange rates, fluctuations in commodity prices, delays in the development of projects, capital and operating costs varying significantly from estimates and the other risks involved in the mineral exploration and development industry, and those risks set out in the Company’s public documents filed on SEDAR. Although the Company believes that the assumptions and factors used in preparing the forward-looking information in this news release are reasonable, undue reliance should not be placed on such information, which only applies as of the date of this news release, and no assurance can be given that such events will occur in the disclosed time frames or at all. The Company disclaims any intention or obligation to update or revise any forward-looking information, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, other than as required by law.

Corporate Logo

To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/277997

News Provided by Newsfile via QuoteMedia

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

Texas Facility Expansion Increases Magnet Capacity, Supports Domestic Critical-Minerals Supply Chains and Increases Post-Tax NPV to US$780 million (forecast prices) and US$409 million (current prices)

VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA / ACCESS Newswire / December 15, 2025 / CoTec Holdings Corp. (TSXV:CTH,OTC:CTHCF)(OTCQB:CTHCF) (‘CoTec’ or the ‘Company’) is pleased to note today’s press release by HyProMag USA, LLC (‘HyProMag USA’), its U.S.-based joint venture rare earth permanent magnet recycling and manufacturing company.

HyProMag USA announced that it has expanded the magnet capacity of its first facility (the ‘Texas Hub’ or the ‘Project’) and has updated the valuation of the Project with the completion of the Class 2 AACE [i] capital cost estimate as part of the Detailed Engineering Design and Value Engineering Phase (the ‘Detailed Design’). The Class 2 AACE capital cost estimate and detailed value-engineering work confirm a significant increase in magnet production capacity and materially improved Project economics.

In parallel, HyProMag USA has commenced a strategic review to evaluate a potential separate listing in the U.S. for late 2026 or early 2027, subject to successful execution of the Project and meeting the required regulatory approvals.

Key Highlights

  • Uplift in project valuation: Detailed Engineering results for state-of-the art rare earth magnet recycling and manufacturing operation in the United States with a Texas Hub supported by two pre-processing spoke sites co-located at Intelligent Lifecycle Solution (‘ILS’) sites in South Carolina and Nevada [ii] :

    • US$409 million post-tax Net Present Value (‘NPV’) [iii] and 27.6% real internal rate of return (‘IRR’) based on current market prices [iv], [v]

    • US$780 million post-tax NPV and 38.7% real IRR based on forecast market prices [vi]

  • Increased magnet production capacity: 941 metric tons per annum of recycled sintered NdFeB magnets and 611 metric tons per annum of associated NdFeB co-products (total payable capacity – 1,552 metric tons NdFeB) over a 40-year operating life

  • Competitive operating profile: Low all-in sustaining cost (‘AISC’) Xii, [vii] of US$22.3 per kg of NdFeB product versus current weighted average market price of US$56.8 per kg of NdFeB products, with significant scope for price recovery from current market conditions

  • Scalable design with expansion potential: The optimized layout allows for the inclusion of an additional two furnaces within three years following commissioning for an additional capital cost of approximately US$3 million

  • Up-front capital cost: Total initial capital cost of US$142 million [viii] (inclusive of an 8.2% contingency margin and Class 2 AACE estimated detailed design study and engineering costs) over a one-year construction phase

  • Attractive payback [ix] profile:

    • Payback at current market prices in 3.1 years at a profitability index (‘PI’) [x] of 2.89

    • Payback at forecast prices in 2.2 years at a PI of 5.5

  • Industrial and workforce impact: The Plant [xi] is expected to support revitalization of the U.S. magnet sector and create 90-100 skilled magnet manufacturing jobs

  • Feedstock security: HyProMag USA is continuing to develop its feedstock sources and supply through its partnership with ILS [xii]

  • Detailed Engineering: led by PegasusTSI Inc. (U.S.) and BBA USA Inc. (Canada), with support from HyProMag’s international teams and the University of Birmingham

Julian Treger, CoTec CEO commented: ‘We are very pleased with the results of the Detailed Design to date and the resulting increase in magnet capacity and improved economics of the Texas Hub, the first of several hubs targeted by HyProMag USA. We believe that the Project provides a unique opportunity for the U.S. to partially address its dependence on foreign supplied rare earth magnets and alloy powders, critical inputs for accelerating the reshoring of U.S. manufacturing. With the Texas site secured through a long-term lease, Detailed Design well advanced and robust economics, our focus is now on securing sufficient feedstock and the necessary finance to commence with construction.

We have also started evaluating the pathway towards a potential U.S. listing, recognizing the opportunity to broaden our investor base and strengthen access to capital. Any listing would be subject to a successful execution of the Project and securing the necessary regulatory approvals. We expect that the timing of a U.S. listing, if pursued, would be towards late 2026 or early 2027.’

Detailed Design and Project Economics Update

The Detailed Design, undertaken by a multidisciplinary team appointed by CoTec and Mkango and led by independent engineers, PegasusTSI and BBA, is now circa 30% complete and part of the study to date included an optimization of the operation as well as an updated capex profile. This has resulted in an increase in the post-tax NPV of the Project from US$262 million and an IRR of 23% based on current estimate prices to an NPV of US$409 million and an IRR of 27.6%. Using forecast market prices the post-tax NPV of the Project increases from US$503 million and an IRR of 31% to a post-tax NPV of US$780 million and an IRR of 38.7%.

The main driver of the increased economics was the debottlenecking of the magnet lines resulting in an increase in magnet production from circa 750 metric tons of magnets to 941 metric tons of magnets per annum. Furthermore, the Project is expected to provide 611 metric tons of NdFeB alloy co-products per annum. The average market price of NdFeB magnets increased by circa US$10 per kg Product from the feasibility study. NdFeB alloy co-products make up 39% of overall production compared to 28% in the feasibility study with the additional third Hydrogen Processing of Magnetic Scrap (‘HPMS’) vessel, resulting in an increase in average market price of all NdFeB Products from US$55 per kg Product to US$57 per kg Product.

The Detailed Design review also resulted in an increase in capex for the Project from US$135 million to US$142 million due to the addition of magnet finishing equipment and advanced Grain Boundary Diffusion (‘GBD’) techniques. GBD allows the Texas Hub greater operational flexibility to make grades of magnets with higher coercivity (>20 kOe), which are capable of operating at higher temperatures.

Potential Future U.S. Listing

HyProMag USA’s owners, CoTec Holdings Corp. (TSXV: CTH,OTC:CTHCF; OTCQB: CTHCF) (‘CoTec’) and Mkango Resources Ltd. (AIM/TSX-V: MKA) (‘Mkango’) believe that a separate listing of the shares of HyProMag USA in the U.S. could potentially provide it with access to a broader investor audience, increased sources of potential capital, increased research coverage from U.S. investment banks and institutions at a critical time of rebuilding U.S. critical mineral supply.

HyProMag USA has begun engaging with prospective advisors to evaluate this pathway. Any listing-if ultimately pursued, would depend on:

  • Successful execution of the Texas Hub

  • Prevailing market conditions

  • Its ability to meet U.S. regulatory requirements and secure necessary approvals

While no decision has been made, HyProMag USA expects that any possible listing would occur no earlier than late 2026 or early 2027.

Data Verification

The independent engineers are professional engineers employed by Pegasus TSI, BBA, and Weston Solutions who are responsible for engineering design, processing, infrastructure, transportation, services, capital costs, operating costs, project timeline, permitting and economic analysis. The independent engineers have reviewed and approved the scientific and technical content and the resulting impact on the economics of the Project contained in this news release.

About HyProMag USA

HyProMag USA LLC is owned 50:50 by CoTec Holdings Corp. (TSXV: CTH,OTC:CTHCF; OTCQB: CTHCF) (‘CoTec’) and HyProMag Limited. HyProMag Limited is 100% owned by Maginito Limited which is owned on a 79.4%/20.6% basis by Mkango Resources Ltd. (AIM/TSX-V: MKA) and CoTec.

For more information, please visit www.hypromagusa.com

About CoTec

CoTec Holdings Corp. (TSX-V:CTH)(OTCQB:CTHCF) is redefining the future of resource extraction and recycling. Focused on rare earth magnets and strategic materials, CoTec integrates breakthrough technologies with strategic assets to unlock secure, sustainable, and low-cost supply chains for the United States and its allies.

CoTec’s mission is clear: accelerate the energy transition while strengthening U.S. economic and national security. By investing in and deploying disruptive technologies, the Company delivers capital-efficient, scalable solutions that transform marginal assets, tailings, waste streams, and recycled products into high-value critical minerals.

From its HyProMag USA magnet recycling joint venture in Texas, to iron tailings reprocessing in Québec, to next-generation copper and iron solutions backed by global majors, CoTec is building a diversified portfolio with long-term growth, rapid cash flow potential, and high barriers to entry. The result is a game-changing platform at the intersection of technology, sustainability, and strategic materials.

For more information, please visit www.cotec.ca

For further information, please contact:

Braam Jonker – (604) 992-5600

Forward-Looking Information Cautionary Statement

Statements in this press release regarding the Company and its investments which are not historical facts are ‘forward-looking statements’ which involve risks and uncertainties, including statements relating to the Company’s interest in HyProMag USA, the potential future value of HyProMag USA and its potential future listing in the United States and management’s expectations with respect to its current and potential future investments, including HyProMag USA, and the benefits to the Company which may be implied from such statements. Since forward-looking statements address future events and conditions, by their very nature, they involve inherent risks and uncertainties. Actual results in each case could differ materially from those currently anticipated in such statements, due to known and unknown risks and uncertainties affecting the Company, including but not limited to resource and reserve risks; environmental risks and costs; labor costs and shortages; uncertain supply and price fluctuations in materials; increases in energy costs; labor disputes and work stoppages; leasing costs and the availability of equipment; heavy equipment demand and availability; contractor and subcontractor performance issues; worksite safety issues; project delays and cost overruns; extreme weather conditions; and social and transport disruptions. For further details regarding risks and uncertainties facing the Company please refer to ‘Risk Factors’ in the Company’s filing statement dated April 6, 2022, a copy of which may be found under the Company’s SEDAR+ profile at www.sedar.com. The Company assumes no responsibility to update forward-looking statements in this press release except as required by law. Readers should not place undue reliance on the forward-looking statements and information contained in this news release and are encouraged to read the Company’s continuous disclosure documents which are available on SEDAR+ at www.sedarplus.ca .

Neither TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this news release.

[i] Association for the Advancement of Cost Engineering (AACE) – Class 2 Estimate includes contingency of 8.2%

[ii] https://hypromagusa.com/hypromag-usa-expands-feedstock-supply-agreementwith-global-electronics-recycler-intelligent-lifecycle-solutions/

[iii] 7% real discount rates. NPVs are calculated by discounting real US dollar cash flows from 2026

[iv] Current market prices (‘Current Prices’) for all NdFeB products sold in the U.S, excluding residual scrap, derived from updated U.S. 2024 price quotes, over the life of the asset

[v] NPV does not include the economic benefit of any government or state incentives, carbon pricing

[vi] Forecast market prices (‘Forecast Prices’) are the prices for all NdFeB products sold in the U.S, excluding residual scrap feed, with the rare earth price component thereof derived from the latest rare earth oxide price forecasts from Q4 (2025) Adamas Intelligence, over the life of the asset

[vii] All In Sustaining Cost per kilogram of product sold

[viii] Capital excludes any U.S. tariffs

[ix] Payback defined as the period required to payback initial capital from first production

[x] The profitability index is a measure of the capital efficiency of a project and is defined as the project’s NPV divided by the project capital incurred to reach first production

[xi] https://hypromagusa.com/hypromag-usa-finalizes-long-term-lease-for-dallas-fort-worth-rare-earth-magnet-recycling-and-manufacturing-hub/

[xii] https://www.cotec.ca/news/hypromag-usa-expands-feedstock-supply-agreement-with-global-electronics-recycler-intelligent-lifecycle-solutions

[xiii] https://cotec.ca/news/hypromag-usas-iso-compliant-product-carbon-footprint-study-confirms-exceptionally-low-co2-footprint-of-235-kg-co2-eq-per-kg-of-ndfeb-cut-sintered-block

[Xii] AISC is not a recognizes term under IFRS and have been determined using industry guidelines and practices

SOURCE: CoTec Holdings Corp.

View the original press release on ACCESS Newswire

News Provided by ACCESS Newswire via QuoteMedia

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

Capital raise supports upcoming drill program targeting newly identified uranium system along Namibia’s premier uranium corridor

ReeXploration Inc. (TSXV: REE) (FSE: K2I0) (‘ReeXploration’ or the ‘Company’) is pleased to announce a private placement for aggregate gross process of up to $1,000,000 (the ‘Financing’) to support the next phase of exploration at its Eureka Project located in Namibia’s Erongo Mining District, the country’s premier uranium corridor. Proceeds from the financing will be used primarily to fund a drill program designed to test a newly identified and highly-prospective uranium target in early 2026, along with general working capital.

As disclosed in the Company’s press releases dated December 12, 2025, and November 12, 2025, the Company identified a new large scale uranium target immediately southwest of the Eureka Dome. The discovery is on trend to major uranium deposits like Rössing, Husab, Etango, Omaholo, and Norasa in an area host to one of the world’s most prolific uranium belts.

The Financing will comprise of up to 9,090,910 shares of the Company (each, a ‘Share‘) at $0.11 per Share. To facilitate the Financing, the Company has entered into an agreement with Numus Capital Corp., a registered Exempt Market Dealer, to act as agent for the Financing. The Company has agreed to pay to the agent a cash fee equal to 7% of proceeds raised and to issue compensation warrants entitling the agent to purchase that number of Shares as is equal to 7% of the Shares from investors introduced by the agent, except on subscriptions received from directors, officers, and employees of the Company and their affiliates and associates. Each compensation warrant will be exercisable into a Share of the Company at $0.11 per share for a period of 24 months from closing.

Completion of the Financing is subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions, including the approval of the TSX Venture Exchange, and all securities issued pursuant to the Financing will be subject to a four-month and one day hold period.

The engagement of Numus Capital Corp. and the Financing may constitute Related Party Transactions under Multilateral Instrument 61-101 Protection of Minority Security Holders in Special Transactions (‘MI-61-101’). The Company is relying upon an exemption for shareholder approval required under section 5.7(1)(a) of MI 61-101 on the basis that any related party elements of such transactions would not exceed 25% of market capitalization of the Company.

About ReeXploration Inc.

ReeXploration (TSXV: REE) (FSE: K2I0) is a Canadian exploration company positioned to help meet surging global demand for secure, responsible supplies of critical minerals essential to the clean energy transition, advanced technologies and national defense. The Company’s flagship Eureka Project in central Namibia pairs a technically proven rare earth foundation – supported by the production of a clean, Western-standard monazite concentrate – with a newly defined, high-priority uranium target located within one of the world’s most established uranium corridors. Together, these commodities provide multi-path discovery potential aligned with accelerating global efforts to diversify critical mineral and nuclear fuel supply. Supported by a Namibia-based technical team and guided by global critical minerals experts, ReeXploration is advancing a disciplined, discovery-led strategy, building a credible, ESG-aligned platform positioned to benefit from the global race to diversify and secure responsible supply chains.

Caution Regarding Forward-Looking Information

This press release may contain forward-looking information. This information is based on current expectations and assumptions (including assumptions relating to general economic and market conditions) that are subject to significant risks and uncertainties that are difficult to predict. Actual results may differ materially from results suggested in any forward-looking information. ReeXploration does not assume any obligation to update forward-looking information in this release, or to update the reasons why actual results could differ from those reflected in the forward-looking information unless and until required by securities laws applicable to ReeXploration. Additional information identifying risks and uncertainties is contained in the filings made by ReeXploration with Canadian securities regulators, which filings are available at www.sedarplus.ca.

Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.

Further details are available on the Corporation’s website at www.rareearthexploration.com or contact Christopher Drysdale, Interim CEO of ReeXploration Inc., at +1 902-334-1949, contact@rareearthexploration.com.

Corporate Logo

To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/278004

News Provided by Newsfile via QuoteMedia

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

Fortune Bay Corp. (TSXV: FOR,OTC:FTBYF) (FWB: 5QN) (OTCQB: FTBYF) (‘Fortune Bay’ or the ‘Company’) provides an update regarding recent regulatory developments in the State of Chiapas, Mexico, that may affect the Company’s Rio Negro concession (Poma Rosa Project), held through its wholly owned Mexican subsidiary, Linear Gold México, S.A. de C.V.

Fortune Bay Corp. Logo (CNW Group/Fortune Bay Corp.)

On November 19, 2025, the Government of the State of Chiapas published a decree establishing a state-level protected natural area known as the Zona Sujeta a Conservación Ecológica ‘Mina Banderas’, located in the Municipality of Pantepec. Based on recent review of the decree and associated mapping, a portion of the designated area overlaps with the Company’s Río Negro concession, which remains valid and in good standing under federal Mexican mining law. The overlapping area covers approximately 11% of the Rio Negro concession and includes a portion of the Campamento gold-silver deposit and other nearby exploration target areas.

The Company was recently made aware of the protected natural area and the potential implications to the Rio Negro concession, and in response has filed an amparo (constitutional challenge) before the appropriate federal court in Mexico. The amparo challenges the application of the Mina Banderas decree to the Río Negro concession on procedural and constitutional grounds, including matters relating to due process, consultation, and the interaction between state environmental measures and federally granted mining rights. The purpose of the amparo is to preserve the Company’s rights under its existing concession while the matter is reviewed by the court.

During 2025 the Company has made significant progress in advancing stakeholder engagement and support for the Poma Rosa Project, including substantive discussion and negotiation with local landowners regarding exploration agreements that would support the resumption of field-based exploration activities. Engagement to date has been conducted in a respectful and transparent manner and in compliance with applicable laws. As of the date of this release, the Company does not expect any immediate operational or financial impact beyond potential timing uncertainty.

Fortune Bay is working closely with Mexican legal counsel to assess the scope and implications of the decree and the amparo process. The Company will continue to monitor developments and will provide further updates as appropriate.

About Fortune Bay

Fortune Bay Corp. (TSXV:FOR,OTC:FTBYF; FWB:5QN; OTCQB:FTBYF) is a Canadian mineral exploration and development company with assets in Canada and Mexico. The Company’s primary focus is advancing the Goldfields Gold Project in Saskatchewan, Canada. Fortune Bay also holds the Poma Rosa Gold-Copper Project in Chiapas, Mexico, as well as an optioned uranium project portfolio in the Athabasca Basin of Saskatchewan. Fortune Bay continues to evaluate and advance its portfolio in a disciplined manner while maintaining a strong technical foundation and prudent capital management. For more information, please visit www.fortunebaycorp.com or contact info@fortunebaycorp.com.

On behalf of Fortune Bay Corp.

‘Dale Verran’
Chief Executive Officer
902-334-1919

Cautionary Statement

Information set forth in this news release contains forward-looking statements that are based on assumptions as of the date of this news release. These statements reflect management’s current estimates, beliefs, intentions, and expectations. They are not guarantees of future performance. Words such as ‘expects’, ‘aims’, ‘anticipates’, ‘targets’, ‘goals’, ‘projects’, ‘intends’, ‘plans’, ‘believes’, ‘seeks’, ‘estimates’, ‘continues’, ‘may’, variations of such words, and similar expressions and references to future periods, are intended to identify such forward-looking statements, and include, but are not limited to, statements with respect to: the results of the Updated PEA, including future Project opportunities, future operating and capital costs, closure costs, AISC, the projected NPV, IRR, timelines, permit timelines, and the ability to obtain the requisite permits, economics and associated returns of the Project, the technical viability of the Project, the market and future price of and demand for gold, the environmental impact of the Project, and the ongoing ability to work cooperatively with stakeholders, including Indigenous Nations, local Municipalities and local levels of government. Since forward-looking statements are based on assumptions and address future events and conditions, by their very nature they involve inherent risks and uncertainties. Although these statements are based on information currently available to the Company, the Company provides no assurance that actual results will meet management’s expectations. Risks, uncertainties and other factors involved with forward- looking information could cause actual events, results, performance, prospects and opportunities to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking information. Forward looking information in this news release includes, but is not limited to, the Company’s objectives, goals or future plans, statements, exploration results, potential mineralization, the estimation of mineral resources, exploration and mine development plans, timing of the commencement of operations and estimates of market conditions. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from such forward-looking information include, but are not limited to failure to identify mineral resources, failure to convert estimated mineral resources to reserves, the inability to complete a feasibility study which recommends a production decision, the preliminary nature of metallurgical test results, delays in obtaining or failures to obtain required governmental, environmental or other project approvals, political risks, inability to fulfill the duty to accommodate Indigenous Nations and local Municipalities, uncertainties relating to the availability and costs of financing needed in the future, changes in equity markets, inflation, changes in exchange rates, fluctuations in commodity prices, delays in the development of projects, capital and operating costs varying significantly from estimates and the other risks involved in the mineral exploration and development industry, and those risks set out in the Company’s public documents filed on SEDAR. Although the Company believes that the assumptions and factors used in preparing the forward-looking information in this news release are reasonable, undue reliance should not be placed on such information, which only applies as of the date of this news release, and no assurance can be given that such events will occur in the disclosed time frames or at all. The Company disclaims any intention or obligation to update or revise any forward-looking information, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, other than as required by law. For more information on Fortune Bay, readers should refer to Fortune Bay’s website at www.fortunebaycorp.com.

Neither TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in policies of TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.

SOURCE Fortune Bay Corp.

Cision View original content to download multimedia: http://www.newswire.ca/en/releases/archive/December2025/15/c5439.html

News Provided by Canada Newswire via QuoteMedia

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

2026 is poised to be transformative for uranium as tightening supply converges with robust demand from new reactor builds and life extensions, plus data center construction and a broader shift to clean energy.

Despite these tailwinds, the U3O8 spot price remained muted for most of 2025, locked between US$63 and US$83 per pound; meanwhile, long-term contracting prices spent the majority of the year inching incrementally higher.

For Justin Huhn of Uranium Insider, the long-term contracting price rise paired with a V-shaped recovery exhibited by equities during the second half of the year has set the stage for bullish growth.

“In the background, the long-term U3O8 price, the three year forward, the five year forward price are all moving up. In fact, the long-term price is up from US$80 to US$86 on the year. That’s a very nice move.”

He went on to explain that long-term uranium pricing usually goes through periods of stagnation, followed by strong upward moves. This trend can be seen in how the long-term price has performed over the last five to six years, with stagnation lasting between eight and 15 months before eight to 12 months of higher prices set in.

“As far as we can tell, we’re in month three of a higher move,” said Huhn.

“We think it’s going to breach US$90 and probably push US$100 on this move that will happen next year.”

With uranium still far from its 2016 bottom, he believes the sector “has a huge runway,” adding that small caps remain largely overlooked, but “will have their day” once the commodity itself finally breaks higher.

Strong reactor growth — not AI hype — to drive long-term demand

In 2024, worldwide uranium production met 90 percent of global demand, with the remaining 10 percent likely made up of stockpiled material. At the same time, global nuclear expansion is accelerating quickly, according to the latest World Nuclear Association outlook. From 398 gigawatts electric (GWe) of installed nuclear capacity this past June, the organization’s reference scenario shows capacity nearly doubling to 746 GWe by 2040.

More aggressive growth could push that figure to 966 GWe, while a slower buildout still reaches 552 GWe.

This rapid growth has major implications for uranium demand.

Reactors are expected to consume about 68,900 metric tons (MT) of uranium in 2025. By 2040, requirements will more than double to just over 150,000 MT in the reference case, and could exceed 204,000 MT in the high-growth scenario. Even the low case sees demand topping 107,000 MT, underscoring the sector’s long-term structural pull on supply.

On that note, Lobo Tiggre, CEO of IndependentSpeculator.com, cautioned investors not to lose sight of uranium’s core driver — dependable, round-the-clock electricity.

“The use case is baseload power,” he said. “There’s no substitution, and the world is building like gangbusters.”

He argued that data center construction and electric vehicle (EV) adoption are just an added boost, not the backbone, and that headlines about AI or data center growth may be distracting from the foundation of the uranium thesis.

“If the EV story completely went away, it wouldn’t undo the thesis for uranium,” Tiggre said. “It would remove a tailwind, not the base story.” And despite political noise in the US, he believes the global shift to EVs remains intact.

He sees AI demand as similar: a powerful tailwind that strengthens the case for nuclear, but doesn’t define it.

When asked how meaningful near-term demand from new reactors and extensions could be — and when utilities will need to accelerate contracting — Gerardo Del Real, publisher at Digest Publishing, didn’t hesitate.

“How material? Very material,” he said.

But he cautioned that utilities remain “the slowest actors, always,” even as long-term contract prices have climbed “US$8 to US$10 above spot.” That contract price, he noted, is the real signal to watch. Because fuel makes up such a small share of a utility’s total operating costs, “they can afford to sign at US$120 or even US$130,” he said — levels that are far more consequential for producers and developers than for reactors themselves.

While some utilities have begun stepping in at higher prices, Del Real said the aggressive contracting many expected a year ago still hasn’t materialized. “I don’t think we’ll really see that until 2026,” he said.

Del Real said the uranium market is being driven by a mix of fundamentals and sentiment, and right now, the psychological lift from the tech boom is hard to ignore. While he doubts every AI-era data center plan will be built, the expert argued that even partial follow-through could massively expand power demand. If tech companies deliver “35 to 50 percent of their promises,” Del Real said, the energy needs would be “absolutely spectacular.”

That surge would hit an already-tightening market. He noted that the uranium sector is on track for a major supply deficit by 2026, a shortfall that he now believes is accelerating.

This sentiment was reiterated by Huhn, who explained that while broader narratives like AI and data center growth have been loosely tied to uranium, they don’t fundamentally alter the thesis for rising prices.

“If we see CAPEX pull back and growth slow, could that narrative impact us? Absolutely. But once prices start moving, uranium will carve out its own story,” he said. In his view, the real driver is the de-risking of existing reactors.

‘So instead of data center demand quadrupling by 2030, if it only doubles, we’re still going to see the de-risking of the existing operating reactors of the world, in particular in the countries that have expansion of data centers, which is most of the modern countries, but especially in the US, especially in China.”

Looking ahead, Huhn stressed that while new US reactors could eventually boost fuel demand in the early 2030s, utilities are already securing long-term contracts today.

“So the market for those reactors exists now,” he said. “As we enter 2026, attention will be everywhere.”

Aging uranium mines threaten supply security

Global uranium production is expected to climb over the next decade, but is seen struggling to meet demand.

The Australian government’s latest Resources and Energy Quarterly report projects that world uranium supply will rise from roughly 78 million MT in 2024 to about 97,000 MT by 2030, fueled by output expansions in Kazakhstan, Canada, Morocco and Finland — a roughly 24 percent increase over six years.

Industry experts also forecast a modest compound annual growth rate of 4.1 percent through 2030, with output reaching around 76,800 MT, reflecting expansions at major producers, including Kazakhstan and Canada.

Yet beyond 2030, many existing mines are expected to plateau or decline unless new projects come online, highlighting the critical need for timely investment to meet the fuel demands of the world’s growing nuclear fleet.

Future supply was a concern raised by Huhn, who underscored the challenges inherent in uranium mining.

“Mining is hard,” he said, pointing to Cameco’s (TSX:CCO,NYSE:CCJ) struggles at MacArthur River as it transitions to a new phase of the mine. The company has experienced mill downtime and production setbacks, yet still aims to deliver 15 million pounds of uranium in 2025, down from its typical 18 million. “These are very complicated underground mines with high-grade ore,” Huhn noted, emphasizing the operational complexity.

Huhn also highlighted long-term concerns: “Cigar Lake will be offline in 10 years, MacArthur River in 15. The two biggest projects that the industry relies on are finite. They need replacements if they intend to stay in uranium mining.”

Regarding Kazatomprom, he said the company is adopting a “value over volume” approach, focusing on responsible management of legacy assets while balancing joint ventures with Russia and China.

However, many of its projects are expected to peak over the next five years, with steep decline rates looming in the 2030s. Huhn warned: “Both (major miners) have pipeline problems into the 2030s. Without new development, the market will struggle to balance supply with the surging demand ahead.”

To facilitate this growth, Huhn stressed that uranium prices will need to stay elevated to incentivize the capital expenditures required to meet long-term demand.

“Looking at what the world will need to supply 250 million to 300 million pounds a year in about 10 years, we’re probably going to need prices in the US$125 to US$150 range, and they’ll need to stay there for a while,” he said.

Huhn added that short-term spikes aren’t enough.

“A spike to US$200 and then falling back to US$100 doesn’t do much for the industry,” he explained, noting that commodities cycles tend to overshoot on both ends. “Even in past cycles, prices fell below production costs — like when spot was US$30 a pound, but most low-cost producers were at US$40 to US$50. When the market recovers, the upside is usually much higher than the incentive price.”

Bullish uranium outlook meets real risks

Tiggre sees a bursting AI bubble as a possible threat to uranium’s upward price movement.

“There’s going to be a lot of companies that blow up,” he said. “There’s a significant chance that we get a major market event based on the AI bubble popping, and there will be a lot of panic selling of everything related. And unfortunately, that’s going to smack uranium too, because it has become an AI play now.”

Tiggre believes an event like this would be a strong buying opportunity, and while he doesn’t want to see people impacted by bubble burst, he urged investors to be prepared.

“I’ll be gleefully in the market when it puts something on sale, something you know is valuable. When the market offers it at a discount, and nothing else has changed, that’s an absolute gift,’ he said.

‘Opportunities like that don’t come often. Fluctuations happen, but a genuine sale on something you want for all the right reasons — that’s what makes fortunes for those with the courage to act.”

For 2026, Huhn sees utilities as the key driver for uranium prices. “I’m really looking at the utilities more than anything in the physical market, because that dictates everything else,” he explained.

While uranium equities have drawn attention, including meme-stock-like surges, Huhn is focused on the underlying commodity. He also pointed to a standoff, noting that major uranium producers like Cameco are seeking market-reference contracts with high ceilings, signaling confidence in rising prices, while utilities — still adjusting from reactor restarts and long-term power agreements — are testing the waters with small tenders.

“(Producers) want market reference with ceilings at US$130 to US$140, so that should tell all of us where the biggest players in the industry believe the price is going,” said Huhn. “Once we see the big utilities step up and sign these large contracts at the prices producers want, then it’s game on,” he emphasized, predicting a rapid price reset that could potentially push uranium from around US$75 to US$100 over a few months.

Looking down the pipeline, Del Real said he’s keeping a close eye on junior uranium companies, which he believes offer some of the biggest upside in the sector.

“If you know the management teams and can access these deals early, you can do spectacularly well,” he said, citing his firm’s early investment in North Shore Uranium (TSXV:NSU) as an example.

While he acknowledged the high risk involved, Del Real argued that in the current volatile market, well-chosen juniors can rival larger producers in potential returns, particularly when strategic financing and timing align.

Securities Disclosure: I, Georgia Williams, hold no direct investment interest in any company mentioned in this article.

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

Perth, Australia (ABN Newswire) – Locksley Resources Limited (ASX:LKY,OTC:LKYRF) (FRA:X5L) (OTCMKTS:LKYRF) announced the appointment of Lieutenant General (Ret.) Mark C. Schwartz as Strategic Advisor – U.S. Government Initiatives, strengthening the Company’s engagement across U.S. defense, national security, and federal funding programs.

HIGHLIGHTS

– Lieutenant General (Ret.) Mark C. Schwartz appointed as Strategic Advisor to advance U.S. Government Initiatives

– Brings 33+ years of senior U.S. military leadership, including JSOC, SOCOM-Europe and U.S. Security Coordinator roles

– Appointment of new strategic advisor supports Locksley’s pursuit of DPA Title III, DoD, and DOE funding pathways for critical mineral onshoring

– Provides strategic guidance on integrating Locksley’s antimony supply into defence, aerospace, and prime contractor applications

– Enhances Locksley’s standing within U.S. national security circles during a period of heightened focus on reducing Chinese dependency for critical minerals

– Appointment supports Locksley’s positioning of the Desert Antimony Project as an immediate and credible U.S. supply solution

– Appointment of Lieutenant General (Ret.) Mark C. Schwartz reinforces ‘Locksley’s U.S Mine to Market’ strategy, targeting production of ingots, trisulphide, trioxide, and other downstream defence-grade products

Lieutenant General Schwartz served more than 33 years in the U.S. Army, including senior leadership roles as:

– U.S. Security Coordinator for Israel and the Palestinian Authority

– Commander, Special Operations Command – Europe

– Deputy Commanding General, Joint Special Operations Command (JSOC)

– Deputy Commander, Special Operations Joint Task Force Afghanistan

Experience Directly Aligned with U.S. Critical Minerals Priorities:

– Oversaw complex bilateral and multilateral security operations, including U.S. coordination with allied forces across the Middle East and Europe, ensuring integrated strategic planning and operational readiness

– Led major U.S. strategic assistance, force readiness, and interoperability programs, providing experience directly relevant to the United States’ efforts to secure domestic supply chains and strengthen critical minerals resilience His career has centered on advancing U.S. national security interests, joint force readiness, and strategic operations.

Experience Aligned with the Strategic Role:

As Strategic Advisor, Lieutenant General Schwartz will support Locksley’s U.S. government engagement strategy, specifically:

– Advancing Locksley’s DPA Title III and related Department of Defense and Department of Energy funding pathways;

– Supporting Locksley’s positioning within the National Defense Stockpile framework for antimony and other critical minerals;

– Providing strategic guidance on U.S. initiatives to onshore or friend-shore critical mineral supply chains;

– Supporting downstream integration of Locksley’s antimony products into defence, aerospace, and prime-contractor applications, including trisulphide, alloys, and other strategic materials.

His appointment directly complements Locksley’s progress toward establishing the United States’ first modern, integrated Mine-to-Market antimony supply chain.

Lieutenant General (Ret.) Mark C. Schwartz commented:

‘Throughout my career, my purpose has been to lead and protect U.S. national security interests across the globe. Today, one of the most significant strategic vulnerabilities facing the United States is our reliance on foreign often adversarial sources of critical minerals.

Onshoring and friend-shoring materials like antimony is essential for U.S. military readiness, industrial resilience, and protection against coercive threats, including the risk of China cutting off supply.

I look forward to working with Locksley to further articulate the importance of their antimony project, and to accelerate the immediate opportunities it presents for strengthening America’s defence and strategic materials base.’

Kerrie Matthews, Managing Director & CEO, commented:

‘Lieutenant General Schwartz brings unparalleled strategic insight into U.S defense operations and national security frameworks. His experience in operating at the highest levels of U.S. defense and government and allied commence will significantly strengthen Locksley’s engagement across defense, aerospace and strategic materials sector.

His appointment will materially strengthen our engagement across federal departments, funding agencies, and prime defence contractors at a time when the U.S. is prioritising secure domestic supply of critical minerals. This expertise will be invaluable as Locksley advances it integrated Mine to Market strategy.’

Strategic Context:

The appointment comes at a time when the United States is rapidly accelerating efforts to rebuild domestic capability in critical minerals through programs such as DPA Title III, the Industrial Base Expansion program, the National Defense Stockpile Modernization initiative, and emerging federal procurement pathways for strategic materials. These initiatives collectively represent one of the largest U.S Government commitments to critical minerals, one of the largest Lieutenant General Schwartz’s expertise will support Locksley in navigating these programs as the Company advances its ‘U.S Mine to Market’ strategy for antimony.

About Locksley Resources Limited:

Locksley Resources Limited (ASX:LKY,OTC:LKYRF) (FRA:X5L) (OTCMKTS:LKYRF) is an ASX listed explorer focused on critical minerals in the United States of America. The Company is actively advancing exploration across two key assets: the Mojave Project in California, targeting rare earth elements (REEs) and antimony. Locksley Resources aims to generate shareholder value through strategic exploration, discovery and development in this highly prospective mineral region.

Mojave Project

Located in the Mojave Desert, California, the Mojave Project comprises over 250 claims across two contiguous prospect areas, namely, the North Block/Northeast Block and the El Campo Prospect. The North Block directly abuts claims held by MP Materials, while El Campo lies along strike of the Mountain Pass Mine and is enveloped by MP Materials’ claims, highlighting the strong geological continuity and exploration potential of the project area.

In addition to rare earths, the Mojave Project hosts the historic ‘Desert Antimony Mine’, which last operated in 1937. Despite the United States currently having no domestic antimony production, demand for the metal remains high due to its essential role in defense systems, semiconductors, and metal alloys. With significant surface sample results, the Desert Mine prospect represents one of the highest-grade known antimony occurrences in the U.S.

Locksley’s North American position is further strengthened by rising geopolitical urgency to diversify supply chains away from China, the global leader in both REE & antimony production. With its maiden drilling program planned, the Mojave Project is uniquely positioned to align with U.S. strategic objectives around critical mineral independence and economic security.

Tottenham Project

Locksley’s Australian portfolio comprises the advanced Tottenham Copper-Gold Project in New South Wales, focused on VMS-style mineralisation

Source:
Locksley Resources Limited

Contact:
Kerrie Matthews
Chief Executive Officer
Locksley Resources Limited
T: +61 8 9481 0389
Kerrie@locksleyresources.com.au

News Provided by ABN Newswire via QuoteMedia

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

Like its sister metal gold, silver has been attracting renewed attention as a safe-haven asset.

Although silver continues to exhibit its hallmark volatility, a silver bull market is well underway in 2025.

Experts are optimistic about the future, and as the silver price’s momentum continues in 2025, investors are looking for price forecasts and asking, “What was the highest price for silver?”

The answer reveals how much potential there is for the silver price to rise.

Read on for a look at silver’s historical moves, its new all-time high price and what they could mean for both the price of silver today and the white metal’s price in the future.

In this article

    How is silver traded?

    Before discovering what the highest silver price was, it’s worth looking at how the precious metal is traded. Knowing the mechanics can be useful in understanding why and how its price changes on a day-to-day basis and beyond.

    Put simply, silver bullion is traded in dollars and cents per ounce, with market activity taking place worldwide at all hours, resulting in a live silver price. Key commodities markets like New York, London and Hong Kong are just a few locations where investors trade the metal. London is seen as the center of physical silver trade, while the COMEX division of the New York Mercantile Exchange, called the NYMEX, is where most paper trading is done.

    There are two popular ways to invest in silver. The first is through purchasing silver bullion products such as bullion bars, bullion coins and silver rounds. Physical silver is sold on the spot market, meaning that to invest in silver this way, buyers pay a specific price for the metal — the silver price per ounce — and then have it delivered immediately.

    The second is accomplished through paper trading, which is done via the silver futures market, with participants entering into futures contracts for the delivery of silver at an agreed-upon price and time. In such contracts, two positions can be taken: a long position to accept delivery of the metal or a short position to provide delivery.

    Paper trading might sound like a strange way to get silver exposure, but it can provide investors with flexibility that they wouldn’t get from buying and selling bullion. The most obvious advantage is perhaps the fact that trading in the paper market means silver investors can benefit long term from holding silver without needing to store it. Furthermore, futures trading can offer more financial leverage in that it requires less capital than trading in the physical market.

    Market participants can also invest in silver through exchange-traded funds (ETFs). Investing in a silver ETF is similar to trading a stock on an exchange, and there are several silver ETFs to choose from. Some ETFs focus on physical silver bullion, while others focus on silver futures contracts. Still others focus on silver stocks or follow the live silver price.

    What is silver’s all-time high price?

    The silver all-time high was US$64.65, which it set on December 12, 2025.

    The price of silver has rallied in 2025, and first broke its previous all-time high on October 9. It went on to test the US$54 mark multiple times, before finally making a decisive move above it on November 28. That day, the silver price spiked to US$56.53 following a 10 hour shutdown of trading on the CME Group’s (NASDAQ:CME) Comex and surrounding speculation on the cause.

    Silver continued setting new highs over the following weeks. The latest came on December 12, the day after the US Federal Reserve announced it decided to cut interest rates by 25 basis points at the December meeting. News that the Fed will also start buying short-term treasuries supported silver as well, sparking discussions about the return of quantitative easing.

    Before October 9 of this year, the white metal’s all-time high had been the same for 45 years — silver’s former all-time high was US$49.95, and it was set on January 17, 1980.

    It’s worth unpacking what happened, because the price didn’t exactly reach that level by honest means.

    As Britannica explains, two wealthy traders called the Hunt brothers attempted to corner the market by buying not only physical silver, but also silver futures — they took delivery of those silver futures contracts instead of taking legal tender in the form cash settlements. Their exploits ultimately ended in disaster: On March 27, 1980, they missed a margin call and the silver market price plunged to US$10.80. This day is infamously known as Silver Thursday.

    That record silver price wouldn’t be tested again until April 2011, when it reached US$47.94. This was more than triple the 2009 average silver price of US$14.67, with the price uptick coming on the back of very strong investment demand.

    So what happens next? While silver has officially broken its 1980 peak, it is still well below that price point adjusted for inflation. It remains to be seen just how high silver can go.

    Silver’s price history since 2011

    u200bSilver price chart, December 11, 2010, to December 11, 2025.

    Silver price chart, December 11, 2010, to December 11, 2025.

    Chart via SilverPrice.org.

    After its 2011 peak, silver’s price pulled back over the following years before settling between US$15 and US$20 for much of the second half of last decade. An upward trend in the silver price started in mid-2020, when it was spurred on by the economic uncertainty surrounding the COVID-19 pandemic. The price of silver breached the key US$26 level in early August 2020, and soon after tested US$30. However, it failed to make substantial progress past that.

    In the spring of 2023, the silver price surged by 30 percent, briefly rising above US$26 in early May; however, the precious metal cratered back down to US$20.90 in early October. Later that month, silver advanced toward the US$23 level on the back of safe-haven demand due to the outbreak of the Israel-Hamas war.

    Following remarks from US Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, speculation about interest rate reductions sent the price of silver to US$25.48 on November 30, its highest point for the fourth quarter.

    After starting 2024 on a low note, the white metal saw gains in March on rising Fed rate cut expectations. The resulting upward momentum led silver to reach a Q1 high of US$25.62 on March 20 before breaking through the US$30 mark on May 17. The silver price reached a then 12 year high of US$32.33 on May 20.

    In Q3, the metal’s price slid down below the US$27 mark to as low as US$26.64 by August 7 alongside its industrial cousin copper. Heading into Q4 2024, silver reversed course to the upside, tracking the record breaking moves in the gold price. Silver once again breached the US$30 level on September 13 and continued higher.

    On October 21, the silver price moved as high as US$34.20 during the trading day, up more than 48 percent since the start of the year and its highest level in 12 years. However, silver spent the rest of the year in decline, bottoming out at US$28.94 on December 30.

    Silver’s price performance in 2025

    u200bSilver price chart, January 1 to December 11, 2025.

    Silver price chart, January 1 to December 11, 2025.

    The silver price experienced a momentum shift at the start of 2025, breaking through the US$30 barrier as early as January 5, and reaching US$31.31 by January 29. The metal continued to post gains through much of February and March, climbing to US$32.94 on February 20 and then peaking at its quarterly high of US$34.21 on March 28.

    Following US President Donald Trump’s tariff announcements on April 2, silver slumped to below US$30. While the Trump administration’s tariff policies have been largely beneficial for safe-haven assets like precious metals, there were concerns that the threat of tariffs could weaken industrial demand, which could cool price gains in the silver market.

    Yet those concerns were pushed to the back burner as recent economic and geopolitical events have raised analysts’ expectations of a September rate cut by the Fed. The benchmark rate has not changed since November 2024.

    On June 5, the silver price rose to a 13 year high of US$36.05 in early morning trading, before retreating toward the US$35.50 mark. By June 16, the white metal had broken through the US$37 mark for the first time since May 2011.

    In July, increasing geopolitical strife in the Middle East and Russia-Ukraine coupled with a positive outlook for China’s solar power industry proved price positive for both silver’s precious metals and industrial angles.

    The silver price overtook the US$39 level to reach US$39.24 on July 22.

    These same forces, coupled with the nearly unanimous rate cut expectations, launched the price of silver to over US$40 on August 31 for the first time since 2011, and by September 3 it had climbed as high as US$41.45. Silver continued climbing through September, progressively breaking level after level to top US$47 by the month’s end.

    The white metal broke its all-time highs in most currencies, including Canadian dollars and Australian dollars, on September 22.

    Silver started Q4 by continuing its ascent, breaking through its 2011 peak and topping US$48 on October 3, before climbing above US$51 to beat its US dollar high on October 9.

    It continued climbing even higher on the safe-haven demand fundamentals behind its 2025 momentum. Helping drive that demand in October was escalating trade tensions between the US and China, leading to export controls on additional rare earth metals by China and threats of 100 percent tariffs on Chinese imports by the US.

    While silver pulled back to around US$48 in late October, news that the US government shut down had come to an end on November 9 drove the silver price back above US$50.

    Silver’s foray above the US$56 level on November 28 came on the back of an outage at the Comex, where trading was briefly halted due to a ‘cooling issue’ at a CyrusOne data center used by the exchange.

    Silver continued even higher through early December, and on December 12 the metal set a new highest price of US$64.65 two days after the Fed decided to once again cut interest rates.

    Silver supply and demand dynamics

    Market watchers are curious as to whether the silver price will continue its upward trajectory in 2025. Only time will tell, and it will depend on the white metal’s ability to remain above the critical US$30 level.

    Like other metals, the silver spot price is most heavily influenced by supply and demand dynamics. However, as the information above illustrates, the silver price can be highly volatile. That’s partially due to the fact that the metal is subject to both investment and industrial metal demand within global markets.

    In other words, it’s bought by investors who want it as a store of wealth, as well as by manufacturers looking to use it for different applications that are incredibly varied. For example, silver has diverse technological applications and is used in devices like batteries and catalysts, but it’s also used in medicine and in the automotive industry.

    In terms of supply, the world’s three top producers of the metal are Mexico, China and Peru. Even in those countries silver is usually a by-product — for instance, a mine producing primarily gold or lead might also have silver output.

    The Silver Institute’s latest World Silver Survey, put together by Metals Focus, outlines a 0.9 percent increase in global mine production to 819.7 million ounces in 2024. This was in partly the result of a return to operations at Newmont’s (TSX:NGT,NYSE:NEM,ASX:NEM) Peñasquito mine in Mexico following a suspension of activity brought about by strike action among workers and improved recoveries out of Fresnillo (LSE:FRES,OTC Pink:FNLPF) and MAG Silver’s (TSX:MAG,NYSEAMERICAN:MAG) Juanicipio. Silver output also increased in Australia, Bolivia and the US.

    The firm is forecasting a 1.9 percent rise in global silver mine production to 823 million ounces in 2025. Much of that growth is expected to come out of Mexico, and it is also projecting output will rise in Chile and Russia.

    Lower production from Australia and Peru will offset some of these gains.

    Looking at demand, Metals Focus sees growth in 2025 flatlining as industrial fabrication takes a hit from the global tariff war. This could be tempered by an anticipated rebound in demand from physical investment in silver bars and coins.

    The silver market is expected to experience a substantial deficit of 117.6 million ounces in 2025, amounting to the sixth straight year of supply shortage for the metal.

    Is the silver price manipulated?

    As a final note on silver, it’s important for investors to be aware that manipulation of prices is a major issue in the space.

    For instance, in 2015, 10 banks were hit in a US probe on precious metals manipulation. Evidence provided by Deutsche Bank (NYSE:DB) showed “smoking gun” proof that UBS Group (NYSE:UBS), HSBC Holdings (NYSE:HSBC), the The Bank of Nova Scotia (TSX:BNS) and other firms were involved in rigging silver rates from 2007 to 2013. In May 2023, a silver manipulation lawsuit filed in 2014 against HSBC and the Bank of Nova Scotia was dismissed by a US court.

    JPMorgan Chase & Co. (NYSE:JPM) has been long at the center of silver manipulation claims as well. For years the firm has been in and out of court for the accusations. In 2020, JPMorgan agreed to pay US$920 million to resolve federal agency probes regarding the manipulation of multiple markets, including precious metals.

    In 2014, the London Silver Market Fixing stopped administering the London silver fix, which had been used for over a century to fix the price of silver. It was replaced by the LBMA Silver Price, which is run by ICE Benchmark Administration, in a bid to increase market transparency.

    Market watchers like Ed Steer have said that the days of silver manipulation are numbered, and that the market will see a significant shift when the time finally comes.

    Investor takeaway

    Silver has neared US$50 multiple times, including its all-time high, and as momentum continues for the silver price in 2025 investors are wondering if it could reach those heights once again.

    While it’s impossible to know for sure what’s next for silver, keeping an eye on the factors driving its performance, including gold’s performance, geopolitics, the economy and industrial demand, will help investors make decisions on when to buy and sell.

    Securities Disclosure: I, Melissa Pistilli, currently hold no direct investment interest in any company mentioned in this article.

    This post appeared first on investingnews.com

    2025 is drawing to a close, and silver seems determined to end the year with a bang.

    The white metal’s breakout continued this week, with the price crashing through US$60 per ounce and continuing on up, even briefly passing US$64. It ultimately finished at just under US$62.

    Year-to-date silver is now up over 110 percent, far outpacing gold’s gain of about 63 percent.

    Its latest rise kicked off on November 28, the same day the Comex experienced an outage that lasted about 10 hours. Since then, positive drivers have continued to pile up.

    Chief among them this week was the most recent interest rate reduction from the US Federal Reserve. As was widely expected, the central bank made a 25 basis point cut at its meeting, which wrapped up on Wednesday (December 10), taking the target range to 3.5 to 3.75 percent.

    Both silver and gold tend to fare better in lower-rate environments, and while gold remains below its all-time high, it retook the US$4,300 per ounce level this week.

    Key Fed meeting takeaways

    It’s worth noting that although the Fed’s cut went through, three out of 12 officials voted against it, a situation that hasn’t happened since September 2019. Two wanted rates to stay the same, while Governor Stephen Miran was calling for a 50 basis point reduction.

    Miran took his spot on the Fed’s Board of Governors in September after being nominated by President Donald Trump, who has been critical of the Fed — and Chair Jerome Powell in particular — for not lowering rates as quickly as he would like. Powell’s term ends in May 2026, and it’s anticipated that his replacement will follow Trump’s vision. Kevin Hassett of the National Economic Council is said to be a strong contender, with 84 percent of respondents to a CNBC survey saying they think it will be him.

    While the Fed’s rate decision was in focus this week, market watchers are also closely eyeing its post-meeting statement, as well as press conference comments from Powell, to figure out what the central bank’s policy will look like heading into the new year and beyond.

    The latest dot plot shows that Fed officials expect only one rate cut in 2026, plus another in 2027. That’s unchanged from projections made in September, but experts have pointed out that the dot plot also highlights the growing divide between Federal Open Market Committee members.

    Another important facet is the news that the Fed will start buying short-dated bonds as of Friday (December 12), with an initial round involving purchasing US$40 billion worth of treasuries per month. This move comes after the end of quantitative tightening measures on December 1, and is being looked at as a step in the direction of quantitative easing.

    ‘This is basically another way of saying quantitative easing, and we’re going to continue to print money,’ said David Erfle of Junior Miner Junky. ‘The Federal Reserve is in a situation where, ‘Hey, we’ve got to continue to issue new debt to pay off the old debt.’ So now the yield curve is going to steepen as the Fed pivots toward these treasury bills, and private investors are going to have to absorb more duration risk. So basically, this means loose monetary conditions are on the way, and that’s positive for both gold and especially now silver.’

    Will the silver price keep rising?

    With that in mind, what exactly is next for the silver price?

    I’ve been asking guests on our channel where the metal goes from here, and many have said it’s becoming harder and harder to predict as silver enters uncharted territory.

    Peter Krauth of Silver Stock Investor and Silver Advisor said that a ‘relatively conservative’ outlook for 2026 would be US$70. However, he also emphasized that higher levels are possible:

    ‘It’s taken 45 years for (silver) to finally break out through that US$50 level. And so we’re in uncharted waters, uncharted territory, and this being the kind of market that we’re in — fundamentally, as well as macroeconomically, as well as geopolitically — I think odds are silver is going to continue to climb higher.

    ‘And I think it’s going to convert a lot of doubters into into believers that silver is going to go on setting new record highs, and that it’s still relatively early in this market. We’re going to see it perform very, very well for several more years.’

    For his part, Erfle weighed in on upside and downside for silver, outlining how the precious metal could get close to the US$100 level. Here’s what he said:

    ‘If you consider the supply/demand fundamentals, this is a fifth year of a supply deficit in silver, which has constantly been outpacing supply.

    ‘All these forces have converged to take the silver price so much higher, and looking at upside targets, the next target is the US$66, US$68 area, and then US$80 to US$83 if the momentum continues into January. But the long-term measured target of the cup-and-handle breakout is US$96.’

    I’ll be having more conversations about silver next week with experts like Gareth Soloway, John Rubino and John Feneck, so drop a comment on our YouTube channel if you have any questions.

    Securities Disclosure: I, Charlotte McLeod, hold no direct investment interest in any company mentioned in this article.

    This post appeared first on investingnews.com

    (TheNewswire)

    Spartan Metals Corp.

    Vancouver, Canada, December 12, 2025 TheNewswire – Spartan Metals Corp. (‘ Spartan ‘ or the ‘ Company ‘) (TSX-V: W | OTCQB: SPRMF | FSE: J03) announces, effectively immediately, it has terminated the previously announced (November 17, 2025) investor relations agreement with ValPal Management Consultancy.

    About Spartan Metals Corp.

    Spartan Metals is focused on developing critical minerals projects in well-established and stable mining jurisdictions in the Western United States, with an emphasis on building a portfolio of diverse strategic defense minerals such as Tungsten, Rubidium, Antimony, Bismuth, and Arsenic.

    Spartan’s flagship project is the Eagle Project in eastern Nevada that consists of the highest-grade historic tungsten resource in the USA (the past-producing Tungstonia Mine) along with significant under-defined resources consisting of: high-grade rubidium; antimony; bismuth; indium; as well as precious and base metals. More information about Spartan Metals can be found at www.SpartanMetals.com

    On behalf of the Board of Spartan

    ‘Brett Marsh’

    President, CEO & Director

    Further Information:

    Brett Marsh, M.Sc., MBA, CPG

    President, CEO & Director

    1-888-535-0325

    info@spartanmetals.com

    Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Service Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this press release.

    Copyright (c) 2025 TheNewswire – All rights reserved.

    News Provided by TheNewsWire via QuoteMedia

    This post appeared first on investingnews.com

    Rio Silver Inc. (the ‘Company’ or ‘Rio Silver’) (TSX.V: RYO,OTC:RYOOF) (OTC: RYOOF) announces that, following regulatory approval, the closing of the previously-announced transaction (the ‘Transaction’) with Peruvian Metals Corp. (‘Peruvian’) to acquire 100% of the issued and outstanding common shares of Mamaniña Exploraciones S.A.C. (the ‘Subsidiary’), a Peruvian corporation, which holds mining rights in the Maria Norte project (the ‘Maria Norte Property’) located in Peru. The details and the terms of the Transaction are summarized in the Company’s previous press releases on March 26, June 25 and September 17, 2025.

    Pursuant to the terms of the Transaction, on closing, Rio Silver has acquired from Peruvian 100% of the issued and outstanding common shares of the Subsidiary. In consideration, Rio Silver issued to Peruvian 3,999,999 common shares of the Company, representing 9.27 of the Company’s issued and outstanding share capital (accounting for the recent 5:1 share consolidation completed on July 3, 2025), and, in addition, under the terms of the Transaction, the Company is required to pay an aggregate of US$250,000 by making semi-annual payments to Peruvian over a period of five years commencing on June 15, 2025. To date, the Company has made the following cash payments (i) CDN$15,000 upon signing; (ii) US$22,500 upon an amendment; and (ii) US$25,000 option payment on June 15, 2025, resulting in US$225,000 payable in remaining option payments.

    A geological report prepared in accordance with National Instrument 43-101 in respect of the Maria Norte Property will be filed at the Company’s profile on SEDAR+.

    ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF Rio Silver INC.

    Chris Verrico
    Director, President and Chief Executive Officer
    Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.

    For further information,

    Christopher Verrico, President, CEO
    Tel: (604) 762-4448
    Email: chris.verrico@riosilverinc.com
    Website: www.riosilverinc.com

    This news release includes forward-looking statements that are subject to risks and uncertainties. All statements within, other than statements of historical fact, are to be considered forward looking. Although the Company believes the expectations expressed in such forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, such statements are not guarantees of future performance and actual results or developments may differ materially from those in forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in forward-looking statements include market prices, exploitation and exploration successes, continued availability of capital and financing, and general economic, market or business conditions. There can be no assurances that such statements will prove accurate and, therefore, readers are advised to rely on their own evaluation of such uncertainties. We do not assume any obligation to update any forward-looking statements except as required by applicable laws.

    Primary Logo

    News Provided by GlobeNewswire via QuoteMedia

    This post appeared first on investingnews.com